| Home > President's Corner
HOW ABOUT SOME REAL ECONOMIC STIMULUS?
In support of the “severely weakened…
building industry,” the New Jersey legislature
recently passed the Permit Extension
Act of 2008 to “prevent the wholesale
abandonment of approved projects
and activities.” (A2867/S1919) The theory
is that expiring development approvals
hinder economic development in
recessionary times. It seems to assume
that all development is a good thing,
despite the past decades of sprawl development,
soaring property taxes and declining
quality of life. Nevertheless, the
bill had widespread legislative support;
so, smart growth advocates did their
best to advance compromise amendments
that would maximize the benefits
and limit the potential negative impacts
of the permit extensions.
The bill passed, but without many of the
desired “compromise” amendments of
smart growth advocates. Rather than the
desired two-year extension period starting
in January 2008, the legislation grants
extensions starting in January 2007
through July 2010. Advocates also hoped
that extensions would occur only in designated“smart growth” areas. However,
the bill only excludes extensions in State
Plan Planning Areas 4b, 5, CESs, and
non-growth areas in the Highlands and
Pinelands. The Act still allows extensions
in high pressure State Plan Planning Areas
3 or 4. Amendments regarding
wastewater, water supply and public
health and safety were also absent from
the final legislation.
With the compromise language largely
absent from the bill, and knowing the
prevalent development pattern of this
state, I fear that the resultant “economic
development” will be in the form of
more power centers, strip malls and
mcmansions in our suburbs and rural
areas. This fringe, service industry based
development does not stimulate the
economy in any meaningful way. The
business market is the real indicator of a
healthy economy. According to Jones Lang LaSalle, New Jersey’s overall office
vacancy rate reached 22.3% at the end of
the first quarter 2008, and the sublease
vacancy rate increased 7.6% over last
year (Star Ledger, 4/25/08). The predictions
of businesses leaving Manhattan,
where the vacancy rate is a comparative
7.6%, for New Jersey’s glut of office
space have not come to fruition. The
lagging economy has much to do with
this, which might seem to support the
legislature’s intent in passing the Permit
Extension Act of 2008. With all this already
vacant space; however, does it
seem practical to extend approvals for
more office space? Moreover, does it
seem likely that developers will take
advantage of the extension to build office
space in an already saturated market?
Meanwhile, the news out of Rutgers is
that New Jersey is consistently realizing
a net out-migration. Where are they
going? The usual suspects of New York,
Florida and Pennsylvania top the list, but
they are also going south and west to
California, North Carolina, Virginia,
Georgia, Texas and Maryland. (Rutgers
Regional Report 10/07) Many of these
destinations have a more palatable tax
climate for both residents and business.
This is exemplified by the increase in
knowledge-based jobs in the southern
Atlantic states, and the resultant inmigration
to these states.
All of these trends and statistics preceded
the current economic downturn.
New Jersey has a glut of underutilized
and vacant properties in its urban core
and inner-ring suburbs, and its higher
paying professional jobs (and professional
workers) are leaving the state for
more desirable locations. Permit extensions
do not solve the underlying problem--
businesses and their employees
cannot afford to stay here, and it is not
the cost of permits that is making it unaffordable.
New Jersey should borrow
notes from Governor Rendell of Pennsylvania, where they have out-paced
New Jersey in business attraction over
the past few years (with much of that
business coming from New Jersey!).
Pennsylvania has a comprehensive stimulus
package with real support within government.
New Jersey can have economic development
without sacrificing our environmental
integrity and rural character. The
legislature would have done better to
extend permits only in urban areas and
centers, and provide more incentives for
redevelopment. Moreover, New Jersey
would benefit from responsible reinvestment
in its urban core, up grading and
expanding its mass transit infrastructure
and making it harder/less desirable to
develop in the rural areas. New Jersey
also needs to provide tangible incentives
and real government support to do business
here. No longer can we rest on our
laurels, and assume our proximity to
Manhattan makes us desirable. In a global
market, distance is no longer a hurdle.
We have to adapt to the times, and do it
fast, or not even permit extensions will
help us through this recession.
The President’s Corner reflects the
President’s opinion and not necessarily
that of the APA-NJ Executive
Committee or APA-NJ membership. The President can be contacted at pres@njapa.org.
|